Namebeam
NAMEBEAM
Real numbers. No hype. Receipts.
Run my free check
Namebeam medallion
Namebeam  |  The Verification Standard

THE STANDARD

Published 2026-08-01  |  Set by a company with zero customers

Set by a startup with zero customers, because a company with nothing to hide is the only one free enough to set it.

What We Publish

The record we publish, dated and public

We started from bare zero on every product and published it. Our own five engine check: zero of five named us, dated July 31, 2026, public at proof.namebeam.ai. An append-only corpus on GitHub where every test, miss, and fix is logged and nothing is ever edited or deleted. Dated report cards of what AI engines actually answer in real markets. Losses print the same size as wins. That is the record, and it grows every week.

The Open Challenge

If you are deciding between us and anyone, ask them one thing: show your public record. Dated checks. Losses included. A beginning they are willing to show. We are not asking anyone to be perfect. We are asking for receipts. If they deliver them, you have two honest companies to choose from, and everybody wins. If they go quiet, the silence answered for them. No names, no arguments, no back and forth. The bar does the talking.

The Requirements

What matching the standard requires

To match this standard, a company must:
  1. Publish your starting score, even when it is zero.
  2. Date every claim.
  3. Log the misses the same size as the wins.
  4. Keep the record append-only, so history cannot be rewritten.
  5. Let anyone verify it without asking permission.
The Four Questions

The gradeable version: four yes or no questions

Any measurement vendor can be graded on the record with four questions:
  1. Do you publish your OWN number, the same metric you sell, run on yourself?
  2. Is every figure dated?
  3. Are the raw samples attached and public, so anyone can re-check?
  4. Do your misses print at full size, same type as the wins?
Our own scorecard, graded first: own number published from a daily public log, yes. Dated, yes. Samples public in an append-only repository, yes. Misses at full size, yes: zero third-party mentions and zero paying customers print on this site today, dated.

We grade the whole category against these four questions in The Recommendation Files. As of the 2026-08-07 edition: 19 tools graded, 9 publish a dated number about themselves once, zero publish an ongoing series, zero print a miss. Any vendor who meets all four gets said so there, named and linked, with their evidence. The standard costs nothing but honesty.

Audit Us First

Critique us before you spend a dollar. The disappointment of a purchase cannot exist when the proof is public before the purchase. Our record: proof.namebeam.ai. Our corpus: github.com/mrcrtr1979-droid/namebeam-visibility-index. Our dated market report cards are linked across this site. We are customer zero. We ran our own check first, and we eat our own cooking before we serve it.

Arm yourself first: Five Questions To Ask Any Marketing Vendor.

Run It Yourself

Try it before you trust it

Run the free multi-engine check on your own name and get the same kind of dated receipt we publish on ourselves, before you spend a dollar on anything else.

Run the free check. Get the dated receipt.Get booked, talk it through
Free. No card, no signup. Dated, public, and checkable before you spend a dollar.
Method

How this page works. The Standard states what Namebeam publishes about itself, and the same test it asks any other company to pass, dated 2026-08-01 and elevated to the gradeable four-question form 2026-08-07. It is not a ranking, endorsement, or comparison of any named company, and it names none. Namebeam is an educational and marketing service and does not guarantee rankings, traffic, or revenue.